I'm in the Fort Campbell area and suggest not putting a lot into units because soldiers tend to destroy them and can move at any time if they get stationed else where.

If every electronic device in the US is destroyed, the rest of the nodes across the globe hold the ledger.

So that's another question I have to consider risk bringing in new tenants that may or may not destroy the home, or keep the ones who are taking very good care of my homes?

Some tenants just live like this and as long as they are not actively destroying the place (and they continue to pay rent) the landlord might do....nothing about this.However, in this case the OP has funds being held in escrow until repairs are being addressed. 

Wouldn't that destroy your reputation/displace a ton of people and make them extremely unhappy?

Im there at the walk through, clearly shocked, telling my real estate agent the house looks destroyed this isnt right, they need to fix this.

That is how he picked his tenants.Hope that helps..I mean you do want a tenant that will not destroy your place and lack in rent.

Vandalism and looting are destroying beautiful cities. 

Buy if you destroyed the property for example, you get be sued for that.Actually, instead of have topics to debate over, I would like to see one a little more constructive, where members made suggestions as if there were to be a Code of Ethics established by investors.

Best advice I ever got when jumping into business years back was being taught the rule of 80-20, and how "if you let them, the 80 will destroy you before you even start". the 80 are sheeple, and, they don't like anyone going astray.