data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22f1a/22f1ae3d0dea1d5aec4a03975b72f346df0675ee" alt=""
17 May 2007 | 4 replies
They don't know that I know this, but now I know how much they want to make off of me.3 Comparative Market Analysis have been performed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25be9/25be9939c75f37b26971dddff78414d3f9143bf7" alt=""
21 May 2007 | 18 replies
ummmm, Im thinkin, I havent bought a property yet but from all the reading, and websites (like this one) AND the property analysis software out there, why would I need someone else to crunch the numbers for me??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ec3b/0ec3b720ede2bb69034fe31a32b61a2005c47c5a" alt=""
20 February 2011 | 69 replies
My point is that the 50% Rule is applied to a first-pass analysis (just like you describe below how you do it), and ultimately that analysis will indicate that the property is worth pursuing (PASS) or not worth pursuing (FAIL).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22f1a/22f1ae3d0dea1d5aec4a03975b72f346df0675ee" alt=""
16 May 2007 | 2 replies
(false evidence appearing real) that comes with the first deal, but I can't seem to bring myself to buy in on three Comparative Market Analysis that have been performed for the subject property.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04c6/f04c6b47e749e7682b19a25f80bef069da4b21d9" alt=""
21 May 2007 | 2 replies
So, please, do not go off my analysis...Based on the numbers you quote, it looks like a good -- but not amazing -- deal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd586/dd5861f32093b074782662f8c41f5f79d2fdc4d6" alt=""
23 May 2007 | 4 replies
I'm 23, recently graduated from Miami University in Oxford, OH with degrees in Psychology and Systems Analysis, and currently work as a technology integration consultant for one of the Big 4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65f7e/65f7e4c67f5d568f780d69abed22a34a82c65124" alt=""
27 May 2007 | 4 replies
Good morning everyone,I hope your week has been good so far.I need your analysis of this possible deal that my realtor tossed my way.Seller is facing foreclosure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f89f/1f89f3c419cdfe780431fbe0d1d88fb74f4a2159" alt=""
24 May 2007 | 6 replies
Alot of banks will allow a 3x repair value for the home to be factored in the market analysis of a home in a pre-list stage.I deal with foreclosures on both sides, the agent preparing to sell, and the investor wanting to buy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6823a/6823a80ea325a69a53c5978fb46765589832945b" alt=""
1 June 2007 | 12 replies
I wouldn't even CONSIDER deal number 2 unless the purchase price was at or below $57,500.Of course, you'd still have to perform a cash flow analysis using real world numbers (with all of the expenses, not just the ones you included).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e435d/e435dbc704c2b63ac32e4dee4c1ade5136f8f569" alt=""
8 June 2007 | 10 replies
I like MikeOH's analysis method that he has alluded to elsewhere, where if the property wouldn't cash flow at $0 down, then it's not a good deal.