And yes that is my problem, I know that two of the answers will be incorrect it's just the factor of choosing between the two best answers!

Is that incorrect?...

What is factually incorrect about that?

Originally posted by @Steve Snyder:Lots of people make all cash offers when they're backed by hard money That is true but it is incorrect.

Sometimes that isn't the case, as depending on the county, its possible one vendor may have mapped the use code to a property type incorrectly, and the other got it right.

My assumption is probably incorrect that most states have laws covering early termination, but would most likely have them for tenancy-at-will scenarios.

You might have a winner here but I am betting that you have missed something or have incorrect info from your ins agent (needs to know the property is a rental) / property tax numbers (look for state/county and CITY property taxes not just county taxes) / attend a HOA meeting meet the leadership and get a feel for their agenda IE New roofs Paving etc that will cause fee surges.

They will simply expect the tenant to cover the new difference in subsidy and rent." and "#5 The PHA will never lower their payments to landlords due to budget cuts..." are incorrect.

If there's an issue when you finally pay it off, and you need the documentation to be correct, that would be the time to pay a lawyer, in my opinion.But, to sue them for fraud or for them to have committed a crime, you'd have to show that they had "intent" to defraud you, and their actions have not shown any incorrect behavior other than putting a wrong name on a document - which they haven't tried to take advantage of in any way.So, to me, it seems annoying, but not worth worrying about at this point.

Sorry, I was incorrect.