We made a big push in one of the bigger buildings in Berwyn to get the mice out which included traps, exclusion, etc in all the units.

BTW - It seems like most attorneys only use only one or 2 tile companies exclusively.

Sometimes grocery store bulletin boards have postings or local newspapers.

The educational assistance program must be pursuant to a separate written plan of an employer for the exclusive benefit of employees [IRC Sec. 127(b)(1)].b.

My question is can I claim capital gains exclusion on both properties at same time.

I always thought listing agreements meant exclusivity no matter what the transaction was so it's good to know that it can easily be amended to place a tenant.

@Abigail J Steinert I persoanlly use loans for rehab projects because they are asset based - so that means you can take on as many loans as you have deals.If you exclusively use your own capital, then you are limited to the number of projects you can personally fund.

The reasons for the PR to sell, is to pay debts, family allowance, expenses of administration, taxes, dissension amongst the heirs, character of the probate property (cracked fireplace, leaky roof, drainage issues, etc.)There are no court mandates in CA for the PR to sell a decedent's property during the administration process as long as the PR has Letters of Administration (no will) or Letters of Testamentary (will).Yes a property going through probate can be sold.Since CA is opening up, take a visit to your local library and visit the periodicals section (Newspaper) and go to Classifieds then Legal Notices and look for Petition for Probate.To generate a probate list request past issue(s) of your local newspaper and go from there..Good luck... 

The $500,000 exclusion you are referencing to is the section 121 exclusion and is only applicable if you lived and owned the personal residence for 2 out of the last 5 years.Also, the $500,000 exclusion is if you are married/Qualified widower.The exclusion is $250,000 for others.

The family in the inhabited unit was on a month-to-month lease until a couple of months ago, at which point I had my attorney send them a 30-day notice of nonrenewal of lease.The tenants are effectively ignoring the nonrenewal notice, and my attorney has reached out directly to these tenants a number of times in order to offer them more time to vacate, as they are a little older, aren't in the best physical health, and have an adult son for whom they care.My attorney is communicating with the tenants on my behalf, exclusively, as I wanted to be as legally cautious as possible.The tenants are not responding to my concession to allow more time to vacate (they asked for an additional six months - unreasonable - I countered with two months), and they still claim to my attorney that we have a valid lease, despite there being a valid nonrenewal notice having been issued.