Maybe this guy can, but I'd want to see the kinds of returns he's historically generated first. 

San Diego has historically provided outstanding return for RE investors but the cost of entry has been high

I won't be investing in the riskiest/most supportable asset subclasses such as hotels, and tilt my portfolio the ones that have historically been more stable such as multifamily and single-family housing.

Purchase price: $200,000 Cash invested: $800,000 Large medical complex rehab of historic building 20,000 sq foot How did you finance this deal?

You can look back at historical brackets and see that they have varied wildly.Rates: Not too hard to predict that tax rates will likely increase.

But at least hopefully you have the historical stats from the MF property itself...Tell us about the MF property you are looking at? 

It is usually not a good idea to do an ARM loan when rates are at or near historic lows.

@Chris VanderlooHey Chris some other thoughts, and I'm surprised not more have weighed in:Some analytics / data visualization that shows Variables like: price changes over different time periods (either based on estimates like Zestimates or actual sale data), in some cases, steep/rapid changes, or acceleration may be a window into when an area is getting that critical mass to move forward - I'm thinking a heat map etc after scraping price info over time - by the way, the Zestimate I've found the historical graph is not the ACTUAL historical Zestimate, (for whatever reason)Scraping the note world (paperstac, Note MLS) to again look for rapid changes in default rates or other relevant info that'd be leading indicator for pricing - note this would need more brainstormingWe use Monday.com - if there was a plug-in or something that'd help very specifically handle RE projects, especially as we onboard other people, that'd be great.Platform for specifically detailing projects for bid - something different than the Homeadvisor model, though - If we as investors could see actual historical labor rates on a per unit basis, this would be great. 

It seems obvious that the ongoing historic shift to multifamily dwelling spaces will be greatly accelerated by automated building practices and reduction in construction costs.I know this is out-of-the-box thinking, but you asked for some of that, and any buy-and-hold investor has to at least try to think about the future in terms of decades of steady development and disruptive change.

Historically 5.65% is pretty good but recently there have been better, depending on all those factors and more.