Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
Results (10,000+)
J Chen tenant after foreclosure sale
16 October 2012 | 20 replies
The Protecting Tenants At Foreclosure Act has another exclusion.
Jeremy M. RPR - Realtors Property Resource
27 January 2016 | 4 replies
I think those AVM and RVM are like given estimate based from the data they obtained from MLS and public records. 
Kevin Barker Do Landlords have a right to take possession in 60 days?
18 October 2012 | 19 replies
You say it's in your lease, but I find it hard to believe there isn't some overriding tenant protection in your state law.Is the 10 days just for termination, or can you raise rents or change other terms with only 10 days notice?
Chris Johanski CD Flipping...
19 October 2012 | 12 replies
You are on the hook for that first contract, and while you may be able to insert verbiage (weasel clause) to "protect" you from responsibility, if you are taken to court, you may very well be held to a level of performance you are not expecting.
Shannon X. How to find a neighborhood to invest
17 October 2012 | 10 replies
This will tell you whats hot as the cash buyers are usually investors/rehabbers.If you are picking up rental property for you to buy and hold, nothing high end and have a good public transportation line running through it.
Ben D. Liability Protection - LLC?
16 October 2012 | 4 replies
Hello BP forum -I'd love to hear how other landlords approach asset protection as it relates to your rental properties.
Daron P. Newbie from West Georgia
17 October 2012 | 3 replies
What particular clauses should be in the contract for your protection?
Herm M. Getting a "cash only" purchase approved by short sale lender, but being denied the usage of hard money???
19 October 2012 | 15 replies
Even if they're not representing the seller/lender, there's nothing wrong with them determining that the contract isn't being fulfilled the way it was legally arranged, and therefore they want to protect *themselves* by ensuring that the contract reflects what's happening in real life.Also, the escrow company will now have more work (the loan package prep, signing and filing), and they may need to increase their fees, which *would* need to be approved by the lender.What I'm saying is, you're getting unnecessarily concerned at this point -- it's not unreasonable that the escrow company is asking for this and there's no reason to believe the lender will have an issue with it.I'm going to start stating "buyer reserves the right to purchase this property using non-contingent financing instead of cash" in all of my "cash only" offers from now on.I've put that in every offer I've made for the past 4 years.
Daniel Miller This one will be a bit of a challenge
19 October 2012 | 20 replies
Around here, I could figure this out in about 15 minutes of searching public records.
Daniel Miller credit-report issues
4 November 2012 | 27 replies
They want to be sure you're protecting that information.