The current owner/seller is your best holder of the note on the land and make sure it will be subordinated to a future construction loan. 

I work at a credit card processing company and just wanted to make it known that it is against Visa/MC rules and regulations to charge a customer an additional fee to pay via a credit card.

To become a buy and holder for multiple properties, (other than the creative strategies such as sub2, etc.) you need good credit and money.

Some Realtor associations in Florida don't have a problem placing Option Holders on the MLS.MLS rules change from associations to associations.

I did the very same thing in my mortgage company for others, but with guaranteed payments, advancing the payment to the holder and assuming the deal if it went bad.

An S-Corp files its own return and must pay the owner/stock holders a salary.

Building management has been brought in house.I by no means am an expert and am learning, so my question to the wisdom holders in the group is: are there any exceptions to Expense Ratios being better then 50%.

Although the title holder is FREMONT INVESTMENT AND LOAN and they sold off their mort divsion some time ago.

It doesn't make any logical sense, and how are you figuring 90%.What I am really asking here is this:Investor goes in and purchases for lets say 50% LTV, say 55% after fees.Sells off to seller with some troubled credit at 80% LTV and agrees to carry the 2nd knowing or intending full well on writing off the 2nd as a loss or liquidating it at a fraction of face value if the buyer doesn't follow through.The way I am viewing it, it wouold seem that the bank with the 1st is in the primary position to benefit from there not being a 2nd position note as it provides additional revenue to the 1st position holder for thier payments, but it doesn't constitute fraud.

One agent I spoke with recommended 400 dollars a sq. ft. and cited recent large  fires where many policy holders were underinsured with the rising costs of materials/inflation.