Moreover, I have received my California Real Estate license, so I would be offering the ability to sell the house when it is ready to go onto the market.  

@Robbie Pratt  I agree with @Albert Bui that in the case of non-recourse financing lender is looking at the underlying property as a security for the loan and the property's ability to produce cash flow.

This is because you need capital for long periods of time, making it tougher to find lenders or equity partners.A lot of buy-and-hold investors will also have a more active strategy (real estate or something else) that allows them to generate additional income to speed up their ability to build a rental portfolio.  

Most board of realtors  contracts will have a non assign-ability clause in them. 

I have skills to offer- Marketing skills, banking knowledge, sales skills, Ability to analyze investments, ect.

It is specifically because of the intricacies of the Notice requirements, and the ability of any interested party to object, that the question as to whether 'full authority' has been granted under IAEA and letters testamentary issued is so critical.

They have a smaller pool of potential buyers and they only appreciate based on the ability to improve the cash flow (raise rents). 

Without that cash flow and the ability to inventory deals then you're going to have to constantly find deals. 

Not only does it make the house appear larger but it also gives you the ability to put solid core 8 foot doors which I think is an ever bigger bang for the buck. 

One of the big risks that upon have is that if a probate is opened, your ability to control the deal will be reduced, perhaps radically if a court order confirming sale is required.