Optimizing your bidding strategy can save you a few Ks as well, but I'd argue you are better off paying full price at a great location rather than saving on this margin at a D neighborhood. 

Regarding current values, I'd prefer to argue that with data.

If it is an "option" then you could argue the Tenant has to exercise that option in writing to make it valid. 

I would argue that, in this case, if these forms were prepared by a non-lawyer and then sold to or given to another individual, that would be practice of law.

They will argue over the 20 or 50 bucks and try your hand at evicting them over that while paying you the full rent.

I also did argue with them, but kept my cool during that time.

The state’s top court reversed decisions in the case tried at the justice court, county court, and court of appeals.The tenant had argued the landlord waived the right to evict since the landlord never assessed late fees or protested the late payment of rent, and the lower courts agreed.

@Richard DunlopI hear you there - I'm not bagging on anybody (so please don't interpret this as me being a turkey or trying to argue).The difference between the 2 situations is disclosure.  

If it comes into play, I would argue the ordinance applies to both units because no one knows what will be legal when the 5 years expires.

Some might argue a buble, whatever your take is, you need to know what is happening in the market before you decide to market and buy something.