Whereas if you buy rentals in SOJAC  were there the neighborhoods there have turned to renter dominated your rents are going to e 650 to 800 generally with a ton of hud and older homes that need love and attention..

Pretending that fellow professionals in the same industry of yours are fundamentally dishonest is bigotry, and flat out professional racism. 

Ex would complete Part 1 and check box E and enter your name.You would simply enter the $500 on line 60b.If you are amicable with your ex, you could ask them to file 5405 and that should clear up the issue.Unfortunately, the IRS system is the worst and not user friendly.Good luck and I hope this helps.Ed

There are still a number of good homes in Cottonwood under $300k.SugarHouse, The Avenues, Foothill, Canyon Rim, Olympus Cove and anything East Bench (20th E or higher) is going quickly. 

(I haven't bought in NJ but the fundamentals should be the same)Are there other prior liens on these properties, how many and for what amount?

From there, we are looking into breaking even while living for free.Whenever the opportunity presents, I will later be updating this thread with pictures pre and post rehab, rental cash-flowing numbers, and any relevant crunchy details.When in doubt, leave emotions aside and go back to fundamentals.

But once you get outside the radius that people are willing to commute in that area, it's going to be hard to say that the plant has any effect at all.If the other major fundamentals are not there, I would say that the Foxconn plant would have little to no effect at all.

. - but I see way more risk out of the SD market, then within our market which has strong fundamentals for buy and hold investors. 

Hello BP,I am an Active Duty O2-E and facing that magical time of year....TRANSFER SEASON.

It has been my experience that 2% deals are MORE risky than 1% deals ... that is why they are priced at 2%, to compensate the investor with potential cash flow for the extra risk they are taking on ... if they weren't as risky, then the market would likely drive the price on them up to 1% or less ... so the idea that you are being more conservative by investing in 2% rule properties instead of 1% rule properties seems fundamentally backwards to me.