And finding what components in what condition = what $ and time in sold. 

Here are some of the reasons why: Compared to an IRA, Solo 401k contribution limits are roughly ten times higher.There is no custodial requirement for the 401k.You don't need the additional expense and administration of an LLC to have checkbook control.There is a built in-Roth component whereas IRAs are either traditional or Roth, not both.A spouse can also participate in the same Solo 401k plan.The Solo 401k has additional tax benefits over an IRA when investing into real estate using leverage.The penalties for prohibited transactions are less severe, though it's best not to utilize this benefit :)

In 2024, it is 60%.You may also have an option of applying a different method (Section 179) that can give you 100% on some of the cost segregated components, but this has its own drawbacks and complications, so it needs to be discussed with your accountant beforehand.Also, have your accountant estimate your potential tax savings before ordering cost seg.

What are some components that one can miss?

In my opinion, good partnerships always have a "trust but verify" component, and this is no different with Travis & Nader.

If you don't have to mess with the structural component : don't- its not worth it many times from a time-perspective.

The other really cool thing they do is offer an education component that will help you to be a stronger investor. 

Expect cheap (sub Goodman) components.  

Hi there - there are a few components to this.

Quote from @Sam Yin: Well... in my pursuit of trying out owner financing, I think I finally locked one down that might work.I will revive this post... my post... lolThe original one relented and removed the CPI adjustment component of the financing.