The tenant is now citing 1941.1 and implying that I need to pay for monthly spray.Under California Civil Code §1941.1, landlords are required to maintain rental properties in a habitable condition, which includes ensuring the premises are free of pests that compromise livability.

Prices are high and coverage can be hard to fine, especially in the mountain counties and for habitational buildings.  

Additionally, it’s helpful to educate tenants on ways to conserve utilities, such as using energy-efficient habits.

I say this with zero disrespect intended, but is the intense focus and obsession a normal habit of his as he dives into new interests?

Does she have any legit habitability claims to sue for, especially since she claims to stay in hotel now?

If you find a separate habitable space, the ADU cost is significantly less.  

If you erroneously forgot to mention the signs, then you can see how I didn't make an assumption about you doing something unethical in your previous example as you have a habit of not making clear points and including the most pertinent information. 

Some vitality and growth.

Your silence as to people just taking insurance money and leaving is deafening.Click your heels and sprinkle fairy dust all you want, Jim, but big government is absolutely vital here.I’m curious, too: where did I say anything about government dictating compensation?

Almost all are mid west or rust belt thats the only place those values exist and those houses at 40k are beat up and need rehab most are not habitable As is..