
16 February 2012 | 11 replies
So, you shouldn't be fighting with an agent at all, only their broker (and you probably shouldn't be fighting with the broker either).Second, you only pay a commission if the deal is closed (there are some edge cases where you'd technically owe a commission on a deal that's not consummated, but those would involve you not living up to an executed agreement, which you never had with the buyer the first time around).Third, if an agent/broker has an issue with a buyer breaching an agency relationship, that is between the broker and the buyer, not the seller.

30 April 2013 | 12 replies
That appears to be paying cash, so there is no debt service involved here.

13 February 2012 | 10 replies
A few title companies mentioned that they didn't want to get involved in these transactions and risk going to jail.

1 April 2012 | 28 replies
Im guessing he should be involved in every step of the way, huh?

16 February 2012 | 8 replies
Or like the others said it may be wiser and safer to involve the authorities for this one....Either way let us know how it turns out Joel....Godd luck,Chris

21 February 2012 | 13 replies
To the best of my understanding it would involve payroll and all the paperwork involved with it, ie taxes etc.If I were you...

20 February 2012 | 6 replies
I have been involved in real estate casually for several years, always as a side thing as related to our family goals at the time.

27 February 2012 | 5 replies
But if it's a sub 2 deal, I like to make an appearance to make sure everyone is on the same page and fully understanding what we're doing.Also, if it was a particularly good deal for all involved, I might come snap a picture or two and gather some good feedback for the "testimonials" page on my site and/or newsletter.

17 February 2012 | 5 replies
I own several rentals and don't have an LLC, DBA, license, or office and I have a regular full time Job that doesn't involve RE.