Is this a situation you have encountered or one you are concerned about occurring?

The purchases could be left alone, the seller could deal with it or another way is to just buy out the tenant buyers would mean no harm, no foul, cash for keys.

I read something about if this occured, the other wholesaler can't try and sell it b/c it would be protected even in the computer system.

Now, to my younger investor friends, there are life occurances that you never have control over, no matter how much you plan.

They don't mean harm.

Does the motivated seller due to fatigue occur in the Multi's the same way that they do in the SF's?

Some people would actually do more harm for themselves by carrying.

THAT is Tortious Interference of an existing contractual relationship resulting in economic harm to the first seller and yes I have gone to court over this and won.

It's not harmful if it's intact, especially if it's covered.

"Our investigation regarding the incident that occured indicates that you are the responsible party and we are seeking restitution for the payments we have made to repair our insured's property"Here are they looking at recovering only $950?