In the end, it didn't make sense to me to leverage everything I've built up over the past few years on one deal where I might make $40,000.One of the main things from this thread that stuck in my head was @Kenneth Bell saying I could make similar profits by taking on a much smaller deal with less downside risk.  

I guess I am just trying to understand the down sides from seller perspective so that I have answers and can properly inform them.

The only "downside" to either of these methods; the $ 1.00 for the cost of the cashiers check, or the $ 40 bank-wire-fee.

On the downside, you may be inheriting a headache, as you didn't screen the tenants yourself, access to inspect the property may be a hassle if you have to ask each tenant each time, and just how verifiable are income and expense statements?

The downside is that the capital is tied up and not available for other deals, or whatever else you would want to use it for. 

There are many down sides as to how the MLS is a franchised operation with the Board of Realtors, it's driven as a monopoly with political clout.

This is not a very large pro as the diversification of 2-3 is enough to cover downside risk of placing all in one, of course, it all depends on how well you are able to buy which is key.

My downside considering prudent business practices going forward on this property is quite limited.Once I understood how our monetary system operates then I was able to invest with much more confidence and make better decisions than ever before.

I would add it to the lease just cause there isn't a down side.

From an outsiders perspective investing in Denver looks attractive- low vacancy rates, good macro economic drivers and solid long term cap growth.Are there any major downsides (or upsides) I’m missing here in the Denver market?