
29 October 2011 | 13 replies
It was a clean way to do it w/o involving either of our individual LLCs.

25 November 2011 | 27 replies
After reviewing, shoot, about 100 or more cases, I can see there are NO absolutes and the majority of cases where the entity was set aside usually involved fraud, gross negligence (such as your New York "lead-lord"), or a clear cut case of "alter ego".

2 August 2012 | 25 replies
Is this a good deal for all that are involved?

31 October 2011 | 4 replies
The landlord is ready to sign.Angel, if you put the property under contract you are in a better position to negotiate with a potential new owner than if your landlord sells without your involvement.

27 March 2012 | 3 replies
Daniel: part of the answer to your question involves why you need the 500,000 of insurance on your life.

2 November 2011 | 24 replies
This is a professional business were involved in.
6 November 2011 | 1 reply
Hi everyone, I've done a few deals but never one involving an owner contract.
17 November 2011 | 12 replies
The agents involved might end up taking a note (IOU) for their fees, to be paid when the tenant/buyer actually buys.

9 November 2011 | 5 replies
They explained that with buyer and seller involved the fee is twice as much.

13 November 2011 | 9 replies
As I am certain you know, there are many factors involved and I would have to believe that a market strategy would be relative to the particular place in the market where the home fits.