
13 February 2012 | 7 replies
Do the transaction properly with a title company and a warranty deed.

16 February 2012 | 11 replies
This is a process most commonly between competing brokers on behalf of their agents discussing issues such as what there a coop fee, who showed the home and when, were there any signs of abandonment or estrangement by either parties and a multitude of other factors that only a fair impartial hearing panel would be used to determine if the rules set out by the Nat' Assoc. of Realtors are properly followed.Close the transaction, get your home sold, and thrreated to sue any Realtors for totious interference if any of them threated to hold up the sale unless you pay them a fee over and above what you have already agreed to in writing.

13 February 2012 | 18 replies
I'm wondering what other people here do and what the proper way to handle this is.

12 February 2012 | 23 replies
The other responses are merely advising him that his costs will be higher than he expects in the future so he should be socking away the proper amount of cash just in case he needs to replace a roof, ac unit etc.

23 May 2012 | 22 replies
I see no problem with this if these fees are negotiated and disclosed properly in advance.

16 August 2019 | 3 replies
After a few months of research and educating myself on wholesaling and the proper way to go about things I finally made my first offer.

31 March 2012 | 4 replies
The seller may well have had an incompetent agent or short sale negotiator, who wasn't keeping track of the foreclosure time line properly, or didn't get the appropriate paperwork to the bank.Just because the agent drops the listing price, this doesn't mean the bank will accept that price.

1 April 2012 | 28 replies
Electrical is easy... just stop short of wiring into the circuit box and there's no juice to electrocute yourself with... that said, you probably don't know all the compliance rules to pass inspection anyhow...Generally there's several outs... either through financing or inspection.

21 February 2012 | 13 replies
Some suggest having one entity own assets (e.g. property) and have another entity be responsible for operating and maintaining the assets, so that if someone makes a mistake operating etc. there is some liability shield and the plaintiff cannot get the assets(again the idea of “piercing the veil” is important here).If you are really concerned about liability you should use the right entity (entities), but also make sure you have the correct relatively inexpensive insurance coverages (including but not limited to structure and liability on the properties, O&E on business, personal umbrella policies)The aforementioned is personal opinion and none of the content should be construed a binding offer or agreement.

19 February 2012 | 27 replies
Is the juice worth the squeeze?"