If I go to court and file the unlawful detainer, pay the fees due (not cheap in CA), and serve the tenant and then he decides to pay his rent - will I be able to continue the eviction, or do I have to stop, lose the fees I paid and do it all over again next month?

The tenant appears in court after refusing to pay the rent and gets thrown out by the Judge and owes a judgment.Solve for "X".

I did find a similar court case out of Vermont where the Supreme Court ruled that a landlord is not responsible for falling snow from a roof.

Best advice is getting attorney and ask what the courts will say if you have a problem in lease options with sellers or buyersthere's issues in North Carolina theres issues in Texas there's issues wherever you go and your attorney can guide youThe key is not being a one trick pony and learning every legal way there is to buy or sell property with or without banks

It puts the ball in there court.

Have you used the Daily Court Review's service?  

Not sure what your objective is here with the banter but, It is happening at most court houses.

If the Owner wants to pursue an eviction case against a tenant for non-payment of water and sewer bills The Holton-Wise Property Group will have to refuse all future rental payments from the tenant and that Holton-Wise DOES NOT guarantee victory in any court case.

Here notice must be given in writing (SMS will not stand-up in court .... yet).That said, I would not plan on charging them for March, but would point out the fact they gave insufficient notice when the next ask for pro-rated rent.

Unless state law requires foreclosure procedures under concepts of courts of equity, the procedures are NOT the same as a non-judicial foreclosure. 1-4 is a SFD, if a property, any property is to be used commercially or has a business aspect, it may be financed as a commercial loan.