It's a red flag that they don't have credit to protect, so harder to recover damages at move out, but often work out fine.

My question would then be, how do those compare to what you would be buying in the way of age, square footage, rents being charged, location, etc.?

Rents start about $1.30 per square foot and go up to about $2.10 per square foot.

But it doesn't make any sense, so if you guys can give some advice if they might just be making mistakes, or screwing with me:The GSI (Proforma) shows this:A --- 9,400 sqft --- $3,000B --- 14,300 --- $2,000C --- 25,600 --- $3,500C --- 3,127 --- $1,750D --- 2,400 --- $2,036 (A quick google search has the Tenant as having moved to a new location)E --- 2,000 --- $1,200F --- 2,600 --- $1,500G --- 7,000 --- $1,300Vacant -- 11,000 -- $0Monthly $16,286, Annual $195,432  According to the 2014 Proforma there's ~75,000 rented square feet. @ .2451/sqft!  

One of my first rentals is close to Fountain Square.

2 more things forgot to tell you:1) turn on notification for phrases like "San Francisco", "East Bay" etc so you can get notified about posts in our area.2) low low termite report for that square footage!!

I think the new law will fall by the wayside like the Red flag and OFAC law did.Joe Gore

Gives me just a little bit of a red flag.

Unless I'm not understanding what "mixed-use" means, FHA will lend on it as long as the commercial portion is 25% of the square footage or less, at least that's my recollection from when I researched this a few months ago.

Advisors often use square footage or acreage to determine this.