
9 February 2017 | 7 replies
I'm not sure who is taking the pet right now but there hasn't been any pet damage.

10 February 2017 | 3 replies
They are backing out on a legally binding contract, causing damage to your business, and it's reasonable for you to recoup a portion of the loss.

12 February 2017 | 20 replies
I just want to be able to protect myself from damages while it's still learning to be this way.

12 March 2017 | 31 replies
So I'm worried if they pull out, aside from being stuck with paying for all the damaged stuff, I may have the city say other stuff doesn't work or wasn't done right by the contractor.

16 February 2017 | 6 replies
Long term - it's almost impossible to properly charge the right person for damage to the common areas.

14 February 2017 | 8 replies
I would say the catch is to understand what caused the damage.

13 February 2017 | 1 reply
if it is damaged, an acv policy will probably give you half of the cost to replace.

27 February 2017 | 52 replies
Enough elementary economics, another true saying, "poor people have poor ways" being poor is often the result of the ways selected to achieve something, slapping tar on a roof when it should be repaired, later water damage causes a greater loss and the roof still needs repaired. ( "A stitch in time saves nine" comes to mind as well).

15 February 2017 | 4 replies
The few circumstances where it would be returned would be for Title issues or damage to the property after your contract was ratified.

15 February 2017 | 23 replies
If you want to be looked at as a pro...dress the part.