The majority of my properties achieved infinite return via a brrrr.  

If you look at the majority of foreclosure cases where the Judges make them have to show proof, the banks either got caught forging and/or fabricating the documents or claimed the notes were lost.

If you’re an investor who believes that if a deal over performs they should keep a majority of those profits, attend one of our webinars next week for a 440 unit deal we are closing on in 3 weeks with a 22% IRR and 3.1x equity multiple.

This removes a major leverage point in enforcing the contract.The contract verbiage looks really sticky.

These properties are in major tourist of growth areas.  

if it is serious I have a couple of questions for you 1) what is the last syndication that you have seen that did not project a majority of the return from value increase?  

You may also want to check the Columbus OH market - great macroeconomics with lots of job and population growth along with major companies developing here that drive strong rental demand. 

Sometimes these are minor glitches, other times a major “realignment” is necessary.  

:Class A Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+ (roughly 5% probability of default), zero evictions in last 7 years.Class B Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680 (around 10% probability of default), some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 yearsClass C Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.

Quote from @Caleb Brown: Seller is still paying both sides in the majority of ones.