data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1fc6/a1fc6df27ca439108119f06db570ae7cd65f7e48" alt=""
23 October 2009 | 14 replies
There might not be a deficiency clause in them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82ef5/82ef582fe0d7203f7d211e21dc0ff0eb17ab0019" alt=""
30 October 2009 | 5 replies
Can anyone suggest the most effective way to get B of A to waive their right to pursue deficiency?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15686/15686c578a2879248fb880cb95130454b3a3aac2" alt=""
25 November 2009 | 14 replies
You get nothing or lose nothing through a short sale, as far as financials are concerned, unless the bank attached a deficiency judgement against you for the difference (but us investors would never let them do that)
19 November 2009 | 2 replies
* Do You Want to Postpone Foreclosure and Deficiency Judgments?
29 November 2009 | 10 replies
Typically if the loan is a non-purchase money loan, the lender does have the right to file a deficiency against the seller.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff415/ff415d59b0a7e56edf0cece9bd723bd112075794" alt=""
9 July 2011 | 11 replies
They deleted no less than 7 deficiencies on each report.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/210c4/210c4700eac355eff98bdd1cf90d4738598afaaf" alt=""
25 July 2011 | 4 replies
After reading the info again at the link I posted, it seems like most of the time, there would be no right of redemption because there would be no deficiency judgement (assuming you bought at a non-judicial public sale).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fe8a/8fe8a0bebdb080fbf07bc146cd1194c1499a51c9" alt=""
3 August 2011 | 7 replies
You can do a short sale after a bankruptcy is DISCHARGED, provided the asset wasn't surrendered.When a homeowner says they can't come after me, it means the lender cannot pursue the homeowner for the deficiency if it forecloses.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43d28/43d28f003b407d2e1c50e12495502b07ca486582" alt=""
17 August 2011 | 3 replies
For instance, Beaufort County SC had sales last month, one of which is listed this way:Case No (xxxx)Case Name (x vs. x)Bidder: PlaintiffBid Amount: $2500Lawyer Name, TMS, AddressThen we come to two columns that I don't understand: Deficiency (options here are "Demanded" or "Waived") and "Judgements" which is a $ amount.So, in the case above, the Deficiency was Waived and the Judgement was for $85,453.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37b08/37b08d44773de555750cdc85cc13d036e48638da" alt=""
25 August 2011 | 5 replies
In cases like this the bank generally files a deficiency against the former owner.While you're correct the "take back" idea is incorrect, that terminology is pretty deeply embedded.