But this is a fine line because if that person can prove residency there than you are back to option 1 above.As long as they are paying the rent and not destroying the place then really you can't do much.

I quickly destroyed my credit when I didn't have that same income anymore to continue my lifestyle.

Maybe you didn't put enough money for another A/C unit after your tenant "accidentally" destroyed after you got into an argument about their lease. 

These issues will not likely destroy the economy, but let off some steam from the pressure caused by unnatural policies.I say don't over leverage yourself.

2 out of 3 said "You just can't", the third said "Run rent about 15% higher than you initially plan to rent your property for, nobody's going to want to destroy something they pay more for.

For example, when I see posts here on BP that say "The trustee sale is tomorrow and the negotiator was not following up and not the deal is lost" - I want to throw my computer at the wall - Forget your "deal" or your "profit" you just destroyed your seller!.

., the current occupants have at least one year to use, abuse and destroy the place) then you count the cost of your money, for the 18 months or so it takes to get possession, you are at about 95% of retail before repairs. 

As much as I love nice finishes it makes sense to put in something that is not going to be too costly to replace if and when it gets destroyed. 

Hate to see someone suffer shock & awe from an overnite City ordinance change that destroys their investment (aka the motivation for this topic).

As someone who spent a lot of years in the automotive industry & watched the big three destroy their own reputations with that strategy, I can foresee a huge hairball in the making.