I can give you only a formulated answer since I don't know the condition and the age of the house, nor the niebourhood's desirability.Based on the 2% formula if you buy the house for $44,000, you need at least $880 in rent, but I would treat that formula with a grain of salt.

We will have it corrected tomorrow, when we'll be adding a few other treats.

Once I've done business with someone, they are moved into a special location in my brain -- mutually profitable zone -- and treated with care.;-)Scott, thank you for taking time to respond to my question.

B was treated.

Of course, california was not even thought of then, but it was for a Quaker area not to tell another area how they must treat their visitors or residents to their "forts" which were their cities at that time.

It is a win-win since I told them how they treat it is how they will inherit it.

From my experience, I have learned to treat this as a business just like the property management companies.

(You know the drill - "I don't play a doctor on TV so don't treat this as legal advice" - or something similar.)When I quizzed my real estate-savvy CPA she has her business under a (large) umbrella policy and no LLC protection, relatively cheap premiums on that.

Whether the water heater is treated as a repair or improvement (to be depreciated over life of water heater) is something for the CPA / accountant types.Rehab costs get capitalized on house #3.

One response was along the lines of treating them like owners and having the eviction notice read Mr/s owner and all tenants, that they could all be gotten out very quickly.I've searched using every combination of words I can think of, and can't find that thread.