The cost to resolve issues are negligible.

I would imagine that the cost savings would be negligible.

Marisa,The tenant would have to prove you negligent to be awarded any damages. 

Read the legal documents to find out rights.60% occupancy, in today's hot market, is either an extremely poor location or is extreme negligence/fraud. 

If you have to do a lot of cleaning, then charge for it but be reasonable.Dishwasher..... unless the damage is very evident and pretty bad and its VERY evident that if the tenant had notified you earlier the damage would have been more limited,, the court will likely side with the tenant if they fight it...... proving the tenant was negligent in not notifying you is a tough thing to do.... up to you if you want to fight that battle.Some advice I've gotten for those "gray" areas on deductions...... if its gray, charge for it, but be reasonable..... if they fight it, then push back a little with your justification for the charge, but don't make it a battle....if they keep pushing hard, let it go and move on....not worth the fight unless you are talking big $$

Even if she is the irresponsible one, how would you ever get over it if one of her little ones died from your negligence?

In our contract, we state that tenants are responsible for any damages they cause including ones out of negligence.

The amount of property that the new owners of the complex are disputing is such a negligible, angled piece of land. 

Roth is a great source and tax negligible so that would be the go to.

This is one of several mis-represented or negligent disclosures throughout the homebuying process (Roof and water heater were listed as 10 years newer than they actually were, and the house had undisclosed polybutylene pipes).