Some examples:Section 8 typically covers 80% of the rent (depending on tenant income), with tenants responsible for the remaining 20%.

So to measure the risk, if you're in R-7 & R-8 it is entirely up to the local councilmember who covers the area as to whether or not they would be willing to introduce the legislation.  

I once rented a 5bed/3bath in two days, just a week before Christmas when the ground was covered with snow and ice.Sitting vacant in the winter increases the risk of frozen pipes or other expensive problems.

That covered pretty much everything! 

Please let me know who you have worked with and why you like them (How many properties do they manage for you, how long have you worked with them, what you like about them etc.)When the unit is vacant, do they cover the cost for professional photography to rent it out again, or is that an additional fee? 

So the concrete slab and post burn debris would in theory be covered up when it's leveled to its seal level height requirements.

Basically 75% of the total rents need to cover all the bills.

We still owe roughly $900K on a 3% mortgage.We’re planning to retire abroad and are weighing two options:1.Sell the home – I already have a buyer lined up, so this would be a straightforward exit.2.Rent it out long-term (furnished) – While I don’t think the rent will fully cover the mortgage, it might come close.

$2,698-$1600= $1098/mo would be your responsibilty and you said you could cover it all. 

I understand credit enhancements and additional guarantors are sometimes required but to be unable to cover escrow funds and to give away deal ownership for that service is kind of crazy but back to the main point, the real issue is when the Co-GP is not truthful about their true role or embellishes their portfolio/ unit count.