my take on it is they should do a small roll out based on need.. to just end it is the reason it keeps getting extended.. if they were more proactive and had a slower roll out the tenants rights people would have less to argue.. 

Here are my thoughts:- The CDC argued in front of the Supreme Court that there was no need to end the eviction moratorium because it was ending soon and they would not be extending it.

If the COA declines to sign a release the SA is not going to argue the law with the COA rep but is going to advise the buyer and seller what is required to issue a policy w/o exception for the matter.I purchased a condo in FL at a HOA foreclosure once, Fl is a JF state.

You could start a new entity "abc corp" and flip it to that entity.

While I agree with Joe that arguing over 300 isn't worth the drama this tenant has clearly raised a red flag and I understand why you want to reverse course. 

not arguing just wondering what I am missing.

If they aren't happy with the property, let them out- don't argue about it, don't lose any sleep over it, that happens. 

And maybe both are true, she is arguing about how much notice she has to give and also wanting her SD back in 30 days.  

Rich Dad Advisors: ABCs of Real Estate Investing and Best Ever Real Estate Investor Book, Volume I are my favorites.

It's a fine balance and you can argue every point of it, but having a deal is better than not having a deal.