I would be happy to discuss this further in a PM to make sure I understood what you're asking. 

It was that, from what I understood, there wasn't going to be a way for me to have an in-depth conversation with someone in which I could ask all of my questions - and that was a 'red flag' to me.

I have never understood why owners/landlords lack the ability to take ownership of what they have worked so hard to earn.

However I finally googled it last night and now understood the person associated with the word eviction.

TL;DR: While that sounds a little fishy to me, he wouldn't matter much to me as long as I made sure she understood that she will be held responsible for the lease, and possibly all by herself, regardless of any life events during the lease term.Regarding him, his concern would not fly with me.

Strange, from what you said earlier it seemed like you understood that I was talking about suing a tenant moving from WA to Texas, though the lease was in WA.

Most never understood why a former employee was no longer around because she offered to fill out their Money Order and then after they left, made them payable to her, her boyfriend, or to pay her car loan.

Also, as I understood it the state agency that oversees these types of businesses can come in and make sure regs are being adhered to.

I can probably help you more if I understood the criteria that lead you to out-of-state investing in what I would consider a challenging local market.Generally speaking, 2% properties don't exist here.

Are you sure he understood what you were asking?