As a landlord, I guess you can argue that new developments are against your interests.  

And I would argue for removal of Fannie/Freddie.

ABCs of REI by Ken McElroy is a great one as well. 

You could argue over the next 10 or 20 years that insurance surpasses as the feels roll off later in the plan.

I'd argue that a well-structured syndication should be like ~ 12 - 15% annualized, net of fees, over the long term (higher in the short).

If you are buying from a wholesaler, you could argue that because unlicensed real estate brokering is illegal in most (maybe all) states, the contract was formed for an illegal purpose and is unenforceable. 

Yes, anyone out there want to argue this???????  

So not entirely sure how the landlord can prove you caused the damage except to argue that you should have reported the cracks sooner and since you did not, you must have broken them.Having said all that, the landlord has your money and if they are not willing to budge, your only recourse would be to pursue a claim through small claims court.

Real estate is so great we all argue about which one of its advantages makes us the most money!

At first it seemed like a simple "Oh parents you can invest in your son and I can provide you with a return, what a fun and easy way to do business with family without having to argue back and forth on what color backsplash we get for the kitchen!"