@Michael Ross - looked at it from a 'qualitative' perspective -- I'd stay out even though 'quantitatively' it looks spectacular, just my 2 cents.Looking to see what the more experienced posters here think.

“Your Honor, he told me I could stay for free as long as I paid the utilities”.

I hate it in my personal house, but it stays for now.

He says he is very interested and knows my other tenant who is still staying in my other unit (unit A).Somehow I am bit worried renting to their “circle of friends”.

I keep hearing bits and pieces about a rental strategy that is best called "Renting to the Disabled by the Room for Above Market Rent" that goes something like this: (1) Buy a house with as many legal bedrooms as you can that still has a decent sized common area, (2) rent it out to the relatively high functioning disabled crowd, (3) via some [unnamed] Government program the State pays above market rents for each of the tenets. (4) Send a house keeper 1-2 times per week to ensure the place stays clean and otherwise make sure there are no issues.The up side is: you get above market rent with a much higher than average tenant count.

My plan is to stay home with  my child to raise her.

Does that justify staying with the deal and handling the issues? 

I also have one for Cleveland, Ohio and am in production on one for Memphis and Indianapolis so stay tuned. 

If you can stay with family, they may pay them a per day amount instead of paying for a hotel.

At this point, we want to move out the tenant and providing generous move out package - one month hotel stay, one month rent back, hold fee for next apartment etc, but the tenant is not -cooperating and also blackmailing us based on situation.