Here's an example: look at how much of the job growth in SF is based on companies that lose billions of dollars a year and have no chance of ever making money.

I understand that its not mathematically the best solution because we lose tax efficiency, yada yada yada. 

We want to keep the group on the smaller size (capped at 10) as to not lose focus. 

Does anyone know of a way to write these Agreements so that I can waive the enforcement of some payments without losing the right to enforce the Agreement based on later breaches of the Agreement? 

Does anyone know of a way to write these Agreements so that I can waive the enforcement of some payments without losing the right to enforce the Agreement based on later breaches of the Agreement? 

You can still lose your investment in the LLC.

@Davere CurrieUpside high returns downside lose $.

Through various court battles and decisions, Jerry established the principle that due-on-sale clauses were an unreasonable restraint on alienation of property and therefore unenforceable, thereby enabling many sellers of homes to retain their homes and sell them, rather than lose them to lenders in foreclosure. 

This may be a good solution for you but be sure to understand the law and operate it properly so you don't lose the protections afforded.Most investors I deal with own the property in their own name.

There's always a fine line between over-contacting them and annoying them and backing off too much to where they either lose interest or find some other buyer.