No harm no foul.Just evict.  

Let him leave on good terms, as long as he is giving you enough notice to find a new tenant, what's the harm?

You won't be making any money from this unit after the tenant moves out if it's not up to code, so no harm, no foul. 

(They want to be able to have parties, smoke quasi legal substances, they want to have bbqs and a backyard to call their own etc) Also believe it or not some are still price sensitive (if they don't have an unlimited student loan or bank of mom&dad).My 3 Fanshawe rentals are all in this neighbourhood.

@Jay Hinrichs CA doesn't have a recovery fund to pay consumers that have been harmed by RE professionals?

Screening needs to be more targeted, and be capable of showing an actual connection between the type and age of conviction and the harm to be avoided by the landlord, such as credit risk, damage to property, or danger to other tenants.  

My goal is educating investors  so they are  rewarded and to ensure the public is not harmed.

Yellowstone is certainly not the least of these.Just because an event is rare does not mean it can't harm you or cause you unexpected expense.

Performing energy efficiency retrofits of our properties is core to our operating principals, so we try to utilize these programs when available (even if the program is more show than substance).

A broker may not allow you to even cut the grass on a listed property, so ensure the broker has the fine details before you go out on your own trying to implement some strategy.And yes, having a license takes you out of harms way in wholesaling as you should be working as an agent and making about the same thing.