I'm not in my 20s and can't eat subway sandwiches everyday (yuck)... but I do understand mortgage financing, and credit- I've taught both and was trained by underwriters (yes back when I was supremely broke). 

Clearly an analysis can and should include various angles of view, but no one method is going to reign supreme.

I used to deal with Supreme Lending in SE Florida, not sure how wide spread they are.  

This concept was confirmed by the Florida Supreme Court in its decision in Crescent Miami Center LLC vs.

I have decades of US Supreme Court cases discussing this ad nauseum. 

Denying a tenant on the basis of a past felony conviction (let alone just an arrest that they didn't end up being indicted for) was deemed discriminatory in a Dallas court and upheld by the Supreme Court (due to disproportionate felonies among minorities).

I really like Marc at Supreme windows.

The ony thing that I struggle with is an article that I read; You Bought It You Own It concerning the Supreme Court Decision I believe to have been in 2012 or 2013 States once the object is lawfully sold – or even given away – the new owners are entitled do whatever they want with the property they now own, including reselling, lending or even destroying.

Supreme court just heard a case Tyler v.

The case then went to Texas Supreme Court, where the original verdict and appeals court decision was upheld.