The worst they can say is no.

Risk level - from the threads I've read, I understand that a big factor of choosing MF over SF is the risk of vacancies and how with MF you won't really have to worry about having 100% vacancy as opposed to SF, but then again, the difference between monthly PITI payments is quite large.. the monthly PITI on the triplex would be almost $1,300 while the monthly PITI on a SF would be less than $500, so in a worst case scenario where both are fully vacant for some reason, I'd be much more capable of covering the SF payment, while the MF payment would put me way too deep in the hole.4.

The worst case for you is if it is your primary residence but you have'n't lived in it for 2 out of the last 5 years.  

Really the worst thing that can happen trying MLS is that a bunch of realtors will tell you no!  

Plus there's the added benefit of having control over who lives across the street.If you find out you don't like real estate, the worst case is you could resell the property in a year or so and break even.

This one though, has hurt the worst.

Although a good HOA can truly help add value to a neighborhood, it can be a landlords worst nightmare.

Also, for a place that is going to be used 100% for renting, do you buy the worst house on the block that can rent cheap or a nice place that you would live in yourself, but that is considerably more expensive?

One of the worst guests in any of our apartments was a PhD, VP with a big bank, all kinds of bigwig.

Tobacco and cat pee are the worst.