It’s easy enough to split the credit line by ownership percentage, but if one party uses more, and/or doesn’t make their payments, the other party’s credit gets hit and ownership gets put in jeopardy.

You can easily be either party in my example and still turn out ok. 

But it's too late for the other party to take advantage.

Not to mention this organization would have drastically reduced stress for all parties!

Taxpayers should consult with their accountant to see if they will benefit from a performance of a cost segregation study.However, to say that only the GP and the third-party cost segregation company are the only ones to benefit is not true.It is typical in funds involving real estate to have hundred's(even thousands) of partners.

In many of the title claims involving forged deeds I handled, all communications between the parties were handled via email. 

Here in Texas, all contracts are assignable unless agreed in writing by both parties.

@Christian Carson- and if you are asking about where the database information comes from, you can usually search your state regulatory records online and the EPA ECHO database but it will be hard to replicate the comprehensiveness of the database provided by the third party database company.

First I say they can get more money from the market, make sure they don’t have any parties that would buy at market rate and then say what you would need to buy the house for to make your numbers work.

The minute someone is simply a passive party, this can get you in trouble.