Let's assume the rental income from these 10 properties is sufficient to cover the costs of a property manager and you opt to self manage as opposed to hire a 3rd party manager.

Has no real money and realizes hey the mortgage is not in my name and well there is no equity so I cant sell it I would have to come out of pocket and well I think I will just stop paying and collect Rents until the bank forecloses thereby trashing the orignal sellers credit and basically ruining their life.. those are the deals I have personally seen and that is why I am very much opposed to Sub too as a long term investment by Most investors who simply dont have the capacity to carry a deal if the tenant stops paying etc.. or is Bent and believe me there are tons of Bent folks out there that will think nothing of screwing nice people.  

Since you can't do anything with your deal to make it better and your only choice is whether to sell or not, you are more prone to trigger those taxable events under duress as opposed to the more planned taxation or more likely the deferral thereof with real estate.

We aren't in a sellers market anymore, and I think the reality is that it will help you get closer to market value, as opposed to negotiated against, and racking of days on market (DOM), if that makes sense! 

Would you be opposed to moving the money around?

Deposits have the expectation of the money being returned if parameters are met, and you could well get challenged on this by a tenant if your lease is phrasing it as a deposit as opposed to a fee. 

If it's in TN (as opposed to N GA) you property taxes alone will be close to 15% and with the habitational insurance markets going nuts, you're probably almost at 30% combined on those two. 

I analyze from the investor's pov as opposed to the typical wholesale formula and would love to connect with you and grow together!

Why would I not take advantage of this opportunity as opposed to getting charged 10-14% from a hard money lender?

They can switch to transaction broker but that means not offering advice or coaching either side, and they've already coached the seller as their fiduciary up to that point thus far, so it opens them up to a lot of liability... hard to serve 2 masters when those 2 masters have opposing interests.