If it's a good asset(meaning primarily good location), you eat the 5.3% cap no problem you own the physical asset.

Quote from @Jacob Dalton: I purchased a single family home good quality location in Chicago’s Northwest Suburbs in Cook County as a personal residence.

I currently work for a property management company also located in the Midwest so please reach out if you have any questions!

While I am normally in the do-not-sell camp, in this case it might just sell and buy at the new location.

When you compare 'what you get' for the price in Oregon to other locations on the Pacific Coast including; California, Washington and Hawaii, investors generally get more 'bang for the buck' the greater the valuation. 

It is still a seller's market in many geographic locations, so you can ask potential buyers for an extended closing period and/or with options to extend the closing period. 

It's same as everywhere but location is everything as Japanese population has been declining all prefectures except Tokyo, Nagoya and Fukuoka.

As I am new to this and looking for cashflow using rentals, one key aspect of this investment is to ensure that the unit rents out quickly and while I do understand that cash flow to begin with might not be attractive, it can be a good investment in the long run if the location is right(as appreciation also kicks in).

I’d love to hear your thoughts and advice on this Team,more information here....Property Location: South FloridaRent 1 unit $1500Rent 2 unit $1200ARV: $500kPurchase price $380-385k. 

This home was located in a zip code that is notorious for its ultra-modern design (though those homes are still sitting for sale).