
11 October 2014 | 5 replies
@Ned Carey I totally understand exactly what you are saying, but at the same time, it certainly gives the investor a heck of a lot more comfort if the project manager/partner has some skin (meaning cash in addition to their time) in the game.
22 November 2014 | 10 replies
I'm here to learn, learn, and learn some more until I put some skin in the game and get the ball rolling.

16 January 2015 | 10 replies
You must have hella thick skin to be making $5k offers!

1 February 2015 | 11 replies
But they are prime candidates for HML.. they are bouncing back have experience and usually have at least 20% skin in the game.. those are prime candidates for most HML.

9 June 2007 | 10 replies
If this is not the case, and since many lenders want to know that you have "skin" in the game, you might consider these possble opportunities: 1) Once you've determined where you need to be on pricing, let the seller keep some of their asking price, in lieu of them paying for some of the repairs -- For one customer seeking a reduction in the price of a commercial site from $700K to $550 to cover half of the land development costs.

8 January 2014 | 3 replies
Now I need to figure out some operation capital with the terms I need to empower everything else.I am stuck pickle in the middle, I have a few banks willing and interested in playing ball and funding me, the issue is I need to throw some skin into each property for a 1yr term.

9 January 2014 | 6 replies
I think the terms @J Scott laid out would be very fair - if you have no experience and no skin in the game, I wouldn't be agreeable to lending any money on it.

7 February 2012 | 75 replies
Those of you in your early 20's who have skin in the game have no idea how far ahead you are of the curve.

20 March 2010 | 24 replies
Simply put, the buyer SHOULD have some "skin in the game."

22 May 2012 | 8 replies
That feeling of having "skin in the game", brings another level of awareness to the playing field.