the policies local governments enforce there are something else for property owners. 

But if the tax rolls and the assessments are certified as of a certain date for everyone, then the government is consistent and no one can claim unfairness .

Different in theory but the same strict government principle applies. 

The good news is that raising the lending limit doesn’t cost the Federal government more money, since the cost is covered by the fees paid by the borrowers.Should Congress fail to raise the lending limit in time, many of the loans destined for SBA 7(a) funding will have to pivot over to private money lenders for funding.

That's a lot of spare change not having to go to the government if you sell now...

If you are disciplined enough to pay them once per year you can use the money to make more instead of giving it to the government to invest/hold until April.  

It's under a government program that pegs prices to nearby rents, keeping prices artificially low.

Not even the government agencies.

Typical vague law, on purpose so government can define and enforce how it likes.So because the HOA forbade me to rent out as a 30-day minimum rental, which I could easily get $5,000+ in the high season and $3,500+ in the low season from mainland visitors (mostly Canadians), and the zoning department did not allow 2 families to live in the same single-family home, I had to move out of the home and would have to rely on long-term rentals from the impoverished local economy.So with the low rent against a high mortgage just made it not worth it at all and I was losing -$700 per month, even with an optimal renter.

The only reason why I might not refinance this loan myself is because there is a possibility that I will work for the government someday (I want to eventually work as a federal prosecutor) and this would make me eligible for loan forgiveness.I think that it is safe to invest in something if you are beating your student loan rate.