It is unnecessary to stop private buyers and sellers from transacting business that is beneficial to both of them--they are not the problem that the bill seeks to solve.

There aren't really any unnecessary expenses.

TeriJust to let you know what you wanted to do the first time is really a simultaneous close or a "dry" close where you use the funds from the second part of the deal to close the first part.Even though this is legal, it is getting much harder to find a title company to do them.and lenders are putting in conditions to prevent them.What your now going to do is a true double close or "wet" close where each transaction is funded separately.

Ralph, If I tow the line, what's to prevent them from wrecking the house out of spite and/or making my life miserable as I try to show the house during the month of July to prospective buyers?

So I said, "Let me get this straight, HUD will waive the 90 seasoning requirement on a HUD REO for an FHA buyer, but they will NOT waive it for an FHA buyer on a short sale that would prevent another HUD REO?".

One could argue that we didn't spend enough in that war to prevent the recession...

We can't prevent it but we can mitigate it by getting them started right.

Unnecessary?

I don't think it's a serious foundation problem, but if there is something I can do to prevent it from getting worse I would like to do it.thanks in advance for your help.

That having plenty of weapons did not keep them out of war, and didn't prevent them being invaded.