If your product is nice, I believe you'll attract the right kind of renter (factory worker, lineman, etc). 

Check your lease, but in any standard lease, there will be some clause that says they have to abide by laws and/or not bother their neighbors or cause disturbances, etc.This means, you can say they have violated their lease - which then gives you the right to give them a remedy or quit notice.I have to agree with the others - even if they are sweet, and the notice of violations only boil down to the dogs running around and not necessarily doing any kind of harm - they are now your liability.  

Be kind to yourself and feel free to send me a DM if you think that I can be helpful resource.That makes sense but yes I do have FOMO, house prices have historically increased faster than rents, thats a nation wide trend.

Once you decide what kind of place you want own/manage then you can start to work on the regs in an area.

Insane.Personally that kind of rule alone would make me avoid the area completely.

Yes, this is an angry kind of post.

All kinds of restrictions on selling, moving and financing. 

An investor can enhance returns in the SM all kinds of ways. 

I understand credit enhancements and additional guarantors are sometimes required but to be unable to cover escrow funds and to give away deal ownership for that service is kind of crazy but back to the main point, the real issue is when the Co-GP is not truthful about their true role or embellishes their portfolio/ unit count. 

It’s a tough decision, but we’re adjusting our strategy to align with market conditions and our timeline.Having come from a corporate background, I’m used to doing these kinds of planning exercises.