If the 3 year rule goes into place it will majorly shift the rental market as Len was saying. 

They're a bit dark and some rooms need a different camera lens to truly/better capture it.Your pricing seems on par though from a quick look of nearby rentals, so could be the time of year.

It then becomes a downward spiral of low property values attracting low quality buyer / tenants and owners which leads to lower quality tax payers.Through the lens of a #Califoria investor, It is often alluring seeing these price/unit vs rent/invome.

So unless a buyer plans to also live in the duplex, everyone else will be looking at the property through the same investor lens.  

I think regardless of the situation, you have to look at it through the lens of an investor only and take yourself out of equation (as in yourself living in the unit).

I'm always willing to look through another lens.  

If you want to contact others just to see if someone else better fits your style, you can contact Robert Taylor (Independence Realty) who focuses on smaller stuff but has some 16-36 unit stuff sometimes, Len Johnson (Gateway) who used to work with Andy and handled a lot of his smaller (under 100 unit) stuff but recently went off on her own, and David Wilson with Berkadia, who handles larger properties.

It is true that in all scenarios they are still corporation, but from a taxation lens, they are not seen the same.A Canadian Controlled Private Corporation (CCPC) who primarily earns passive income, such as an investment company / holding company,  is in-eleigible for the small business tax rate reduction afforded most CCPCs which earn their income from an "active" business.  

As @Len Roche suggested get J.

Part of me says go for it as an investor who is looking to buy and hold properties my lens that I view properties is different then how I view a property that I want to personally reside in.