![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/970555/small_1621506533-avatar-shanew36.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
17 May 2018 | 18 replies
@Shane WardSounds like a loss leader stick to your fundamentals and criteria you started with and find another deal.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/792459/small_1621497524-avatar-anthonyt90.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 May 2018 | 10 replies
A house hacker may be ok with living in an area that is gentrifying or with good fundamentals for upside (you are betting here).
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1048827/small_1621508078-avatar-nicoled50.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
29 May 2018 | 19 replies
This place is weird, fundamentally strange in its own peculiar way.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/828877/small_1673285942-avatar-williamsalas.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
24 May 2018 | 21 replies
Sometimes booking a good profit or sale while people are paying a premium is a good choice especially if you feel the market fundamentals are overvalued.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1053408/small_1621508142-avatar-steveo47.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
31 May 2018 | 49 replies
But I also like the market I'm in (DFW) as it has strong economic fundamentals, so I'll probably keep some of my rentals here even if on paper I could increase my cashflow elsewhere.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/991921/small_1621506994-avatar-spt2527.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
30 May 2018 | 11 replies
I apologize in advance, but I'm not understanding the HELOC fundamentals well.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/747714/small_1621496600-avatar-terryl26.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
12 June 2018 | 41 replies
Assuming that the current cycle will exceed the previous peak before turning down is not a safe assumption, especially in markets that lack strong underlying fundamentals.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/592814/small_1696080077-avatar-manojn.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 June 2018 | 7 replies
It means that the sponsor is trying to financially engineer their way into returns, rather than get there on fundamentals - they've overpaid for the deal, most likely,
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1060916/small_1621508261-avatar-ronenv.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
10 April 2019 | 7 replies
Invest if the fundamental numbers look good, you know the area, and the long term prospects for the area look good.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/950937/small_1621506137-avatar-phillychris.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
19 February 2018 | 3 replies
At the most fundamental level, the investor’s return is 5.75%, (consisting of $4,734 cash flow divided by the $82,322 total equity investment).