A gradual increase may have been a more successful approach.  

The auxillary fields with less weighted value, in order: lease start date, deposit amount (up to 2x rent).The overall score is tallied to identify approval, conditional approval with increased deposit/cosigner, or denial.

My concern is the loan amount increases over $50,000.

The transfer and recordation tax rate increases to 2.9% (seller and buyer pays 1.45% each) for properties sold at $400K or higher.I am looking forward to getting your inputs Thanks,A

Originally posted by @Eli Rollins:I forgot what real estate was I didn't realize real estate could be past-tense. 

I have acquired several units in the last 3 years, and many were off market good deals after I rehabbed and increased rents.

If you vote yes, you will cap the property tax increases to 10% permanently.

This means you'll probably find it harder to rent the properties (increased vacancy rate), more difficult tenants to deal with, more constant tenant turnover (and the costs/hassle associated with that), etc.Also how old is the property?

If this is true raw land with no utilities in place that's a harder sell since grading and utilities are the most expensive cost to land ventures.3) What's the current zoning, and are there any changes to zoning in progress to increase land value? 

I've been looking into BRRRR but I'm a little confused on how this strategy works.I understand the most important part is finding a property at or around 10-20% below market value and having the chance to fix it up to increase the value but what is a bit confusing to me is if you refi the first house and get like 80k or 85k back in a cash out -- how does the bank keep letting you do this over and over?