The trees are not on my property but destroying my pipes.

So, I put up a sign, since I now own the other 6 and his selling to someone unknown could destroy the creative community that I've built up, letting potential buyers know that they need to check with the zoning dept at City of Atlanta, to check on the possibility of ever renovating that duplex. 

If my tenants pay, the home is not being completely destroyed, and their is not illegal activity goin on, I pretty much leave them be.

Neighbors can make your life miserable, government can kill you and both can destroy any hopes of equity.

If the house were destroyed by fire during the pendency of the contract, can the seller compel the buyer to complete the contract anyway?

How dare the investors have the nerve to allow a tenant to destroy a home with rentals.

Paranoia will destroy ya.

Pet urine destroys the adhesive.

Certainly, the landlord can leave the carpets in the premises for as long as he/she likes, however should a situation arise where, say, in the twelfth year those carpets are absolutely destroyed by the tenant.

The shortest ownership was 2 one year leases and each tenant destroyed the property so that was a good one to dump.