I can relate in that I've done many things not necessarily because I wanted to but because they were "expected of me" and honestly, in retrospect I can say that many (but not all) of these things turned out to be very good advice.

In retrospect 60% LTV is low, I need my LTV to be based off ARV (preferably post-repair for most value), and maybe I'm wrong about this, but I think DTI should be calculated as Current Debt/Current Income.Thanks in advance!!

In retrospect you don't need a POF when you deal with a motivated seller but a bank owned property yes you do need one.

My investor friend and I did a fair amount of due diligence (but not enough in retrospect).

In retrospect, it totally makes sense.

In retrospect I missed a lot of opportunities because I was sitting in a cubicle and not on the street hustling but that is water under the bridge.  

I'm not saying that I would always handle it this way, just want to get clear on fastest possible scenario if ever needed.https://courtclerk.org/self-help-resources/landlor...Mainly in the "confusion" of the ownership changes, In retrospect the response to non-paying tenants that need to go has been too slow and I want to rectify that in the future, by making sure we are moving as quickly as the law will allow and in the confines of the leases already in place.

What I can tell you is that these types of things are almost always filmed in retrospect.

This reminds me of 2009 when the DOW was around 7,000 and I thought to myself will I ever see it this cheap again, I was kicking myself for standing on the sidelines in retrospect from something so obvious.

So, in retrospect, there has & will always be a profitable demand for our properties.