I wanted to err on offering to high rather than too low, to test response rates and ensure responses came in.

Just my suspicions but I err on the side of caution.

If this is a downtown property I would err on the side of being safe.

i would err on the side of caution and create an addendum.

Quality PM charges what they are worth and they can often pay for themselves through reduced vacancy, longer stays, higher rent rates, etc.When it comes to calculating returns, I prefer to err on the side of caution.

BUT ...When I asked my broker NOT to give this erroneous inspection report to a new buyer he says he must turn it over since it's "Material Fact" and he is legally bound to do so as a new buyer has to "know what I know".

I asked to delete a third party profile I erroneously created days ago, and it’s still there.

Also, in the case of common names, and, certainly on occasion, an incorrect entry, they can have erroneous information.

Many people erroneously post in the Renter's Discussion forum.

I think that if this property were an SFR, I’d likely err on the side of keeping it: I have no idea whether there’ll be a downturn in the next year or five, or whether it would be as bad as from the last recession, etc.