I am currently employed by Net Worth Realty.

I couldn't help but feel that such a reduction would ultimately have some effect on my employment.

If she has nowhere else to go and no employment to qualify for another place, she could try to stay an extra month or two until you can evict her.

It will be taxed as ordinary income with self employment to boot.

However, at some point analysis becomes irrelevant and useless and fails to provide any real economic benefit.There is a huge difference between the strategies employed by a pool of investors buying for long term yield and/or returns and the average individual note investor who may be seeking the highest initial return and moving on to other opportunities.

That's why I added the remark about the LLC, it would serve the same purpose.The thousands I referred to was an old memory from back in the mid 80's early 90's when I was self employed before, the timing was really bad, both insurance and other fees came due at the same time, about $2,000-$3,000 worth, so that was the end of my small construction business, 22 over years ago.

If you are self-employed and your business qualifies you to have a Solo(k), then that may be the better route due to the much higher contribution limits and absence of UBIT on leveraged assets.

It asks me if my employing broker is still going to be (it's blank).

I am the type where I can look at something 15 minutes before the test and almost get a 100 and then dump the info when I leave.A strategy I employ is that on the state agents exam I would select the answers I knew 100% first.

Hi @Jim Pellerin  Thanks for the reply.I would be the tenant buyer, yes, and I understand there would be monthly payments. my credit isn't the best and am self employed so i the banks aren't falling all over themselves to loan to me.