The tenant apartently stated that he had no issues at the appartment mounting 3 TVs.

I’m thinking it wouldn’t be worth the trouble as I don’t foresee having any issues finding another qualified tenant.

I feel like people lean more towards the possible cash flow and turn a blind eye to the risks and reality of owning a D property (not saying this one was) when it is 1,000 miles away and they only have to take phone calls from a third party about any issues. 

My dad owns a condo in Aurora where he has a having a bunch of issues with the tenant. 

As older generations pass down wealth, younger people may find themselves in a position to afford homes, counteracting some of the affordability issues caused by market conditions.

And don’t forget about all the normal wear and tear maintenance issues.

As an investor in syndications and a fund manager, I can see both sides of some of these issues.

Moreover, three-quarters of all audits are correspondence audits in which the IRS sends the taxpayer a letter in the mail asking about one or two issues.

Plus, @Chris Seveney mentioned that a lender might take issue with the transfer, which is usually their right (see the bajillion posts on "due on sale" on here).

So far, he hasn't encountered any issues with neighbors or the County.