A favorable mortgage that comes with few costs and lower monthly payments should translate into a fair market value for the home.

Good luckYour explanation has been one that I've not seen as a viable solution to the dreaded lender due on sale clause.The bank as 1st lien holder, which they already are as the original and then altering to have the LLC be 2nd. 

Additionally the equity requirement to assume the sellers loan based on what price they want could be 35 to 50% down versus a new lender might do a loan at 75% loan to value with 25% down.The existing lender does have a history with the property over time so they might alter the original loan or not want to let a buyer assume it as they are ramping down loaning to those type of assets. 

Which translates into less property needed to replace your income.You might consider using property management or a broker for now, since you're out of the country, then becoming more active when you get back.Lending, whether you mean hard money, buying notes, or partnering has the disadvantage of being lumpy.

Grant -Don't take this the wrong way, but that "value" that you mention will in no way translate to increased value of the building.

The contract will initially be a strategic partnership that will translate into 50/50 ownership of a Series LLC that my Master LLC controls.

Translation: You have to risk less of your own money and use other peoples' money.  

I just meant that what you learn in real estate school doesn’t always translate to real world practice.

Another major change I would suggest to the mortgage contract would be to alter the insurance clause to reflect STR activity. 

As far as the buyer is concerned, if I am wholesaling the contract, they already know the TREC and can see who pays what in a few seconds.Life is so much easier when you use a promulgated contract that can not be altered.